Dyskusja MediaWiki:Licenses

Przesyłanie plików na serwer, Kreator przesyłania plików?

Hello! Sorry for writing in English. It was noted that on this wiki there is little community activity around uploads: less than 50 "Usuń" actions in "Plik" last year.

I guess this wiki doesn't have the interest or energies to maintain complex templates and metadata, especially for EDP files. I propose to

• send users to commons:Special:UploadWizard from the sidebar and
• limit local "Prześlij plik" to the "Administratorzy" group (for any emergency uploads),

so that no new work is needed on this wiki and all users can have a functioning, easy upload interface in their own language. All registered users can upload on Commons.

All this will be done around 2014-09-30.

1. If you disagree with the proposal, just remove this wiki from the list.
2. To make the UploadWizard even better, please tell your experience and ideas on commons:Commons:Upload Wizard feedback.
3. In all cases, existing files will not be affected, but everyone is welcome to join m:File metadata cleanup drive. The goal is to give better credit to the authors who provided us their works.

Nemo 21:12, 18 wrz 2014 (CEST)

Remove GFDL as an option

Hi!

GFDL is not a good license for media files so it should not be used for new files.

I know that only admins can upload files but I still suggest to remove it. There is a suggestion on Commons related to GFDL so I try to get as many wikis as possible removed from this list.

The change will not affect any files allready uploaded. It will only change the drop-down-list users see if they try to upload a new file.

Wikipedysta:Persino seems to be the only active admin right now. Perhaps you could have a look? MGA73 (dyskusja) 16:16, 11 mar 2025 (CET)

I have a GFDL to CC change in the files, and the GFDL license templates are being removed? Persino (dyskusja) 16:28, 11 mar 2025 (CET)

Hi! If you can remove those three lines:

** self|GFDL|Własna praca na licencji GFDL
** Licencje GNU 
*** GFDL|GNU Free Documentation License (napisz źródło)

GFDL can stay in those two lines (dual license is okay) or you can remove them:

** self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0|Copyleft: Podwójna licencja GFDL i Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-2.5 i starsze (2.0 i 1.0) - zalecane
** self|cc-by-2.5|GFDL|Użycie za podaniem autorstwa: Podwójna licencja Creative Commons CC-BY-2.5 i GFDL

The latest version of Creative Commons is 4.0 so if you want you could change 2.5 to 4.0. --MGA73 (dyskusja) 16:38, 11 mar 2025 (CET)

@MGA73: It's all done! Persino (dyskusja) 06:18, 12 mar 2025 (CET)

@Persino Thank you! --MGA73 (dyskusja) 07:17, 12 mar 2025 (CET)